Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Citi raises card rates on millions

By Francesco Guerrera and Saskia Scholtes in New York and Tom Braithwaite in Washington

Published: June 30 2009 23:59 | Last updated: June 30 2009 23:59

Citigroup has sharply increased interest rates on up to 15m US credit card accounts just months before curbs on such rises come into effect, in a move that could fuel political anger at the treatment of consumers by bailed-out banks.

People close to the situation said that Citi, which is about to cede a 34 per cent stake to the US government as part of its latest rescue, had upped rates on between 13m and 15m credit cards it co-brands with retailers such as Sears and Macy’s.

Citi’s rate increases emerged on the day the government proposed legislation to create a new regulator with sweeping powers on consumer protection and a week after the bank was attacked by some politicians for raising employees’ salaries.

Holders of co-branded cards who failed to pay their balance in full at the end of the month saw their rates rise by an average 24 per cent – or nearly 3 percentage points – between January and April, according to a Credit Suisse analysis of data from the consultancy Lightspeed Research.

Citi declined to comment but people close to the bank said the figures were in line with internal data. Citi’s move came as the economic downturn caused record defaults among US card users and prompted many issuers to raise rates, both to cushion their losses and pre-empt the new restrictions set to come into effect in February.

However, Citi’s increases have been larger than those of its main rivals, according to Lightspeed, which tracks about 12,000 US credit card accounts.

Carolyn Maloney, Democratic representative for New York, the author of the new rules that will sharply constrain lenders’ ability to raise rates for risky borrowers, criticised Citi’s move. “It’s hard to tell if rate hikes on existing balances being put in place now are the result of prior bad business decisions or getting in under the wire of the new law,” Ms Maloney told the Financial Times.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Atlanta council raises taxes, ends furloughs

ATLANTA

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Monday, June 29, 2009

Atlanta’s tax bills are going up, but it will feel like there are more police officers and firefighters on the job.

Many Atlantans will see their new tax bills before they vote for a new mayor in November; plus, all 15 City Council seats and the council presidency are up for grabs.

With the council voting 8-7 Monday to increase the property tax rate for general operations from 7.12 mills to 10.12 mills, Atlanta is one of the few big cities nationwide to raise property taxes this year. Locally, Gwinnett County commissioners decided against a tax hike this month after a near revolt by homeowners. Clayton County is mulling a tax increase.

“It will be interesting to see if the eight people who voted for the increase will be seen as the heroes or the villains,” said Councilwoman Felicia Moore, who voted for the tax hike.

Mayor Shirley Franklin’s proposed $541 million budget, adopted Monday, will end employee furloughs, beginning July 9.

One of the lingering questions is how the tax increase will impact Atlanta in the coming months. City officials say the average Atlanta property owner will pay an additional $240 in taxes. That’s based on the average appraised value of an Atlanta home, about $240,000.

Franklin said the increase was necessary to close a $56 million gap in her proposed budget.

Many of the council members who voted for the increase represent districts with large pockets of low-income residents who said they wanted more cops and firefighters in their areas. Council members representing the city’s most affluent neighborhoods, which were among the most vocal critics of a tax hike, voted against it.

Many property owners were not pleased.

“There’s no way to recover that in sales because you can’t charge your customer more for it … and we’re not getting more services for it,” said Warren Bruno, a Virginia-Highland business owner and commercial broker.

However, Cousins Properties, one of the region’s biggest developers, said it supported the increase to maintain public safety in Atlanta.

“Nobody ever wants to increase taxes, but in this case, we supported it because it was for the right reasons,” said Tad Leithead, the company’s senior vice president.

The lines in the political battle weren’t always clear-cut. Many of the council members who voted against the increase said they were swayed by homeowners already under pressure in this recession.

“[My constituents] can’t afford it,” said Councilwoman Cleta Winslow, whose southwest Atlanta district includes the West End and Oakland City, two communities ravaged by the foreclosure crisis.

The mayor told reporters the increase shows the council thinks “the investment in city services is essential to the economy’s recovery in Atlanta.” City finance officials warned of street repair delays and the closure of some recreation centers if the tax increase was not adopted.

Atlanta officials defended the tax increase, noting the new budget, which begins July 1, includes major cuts to the corrections department and a plan to lower pension payments this fiscal year.

Monday’s decision was an about-face from last June’s vote by the council against a property tax increase pushed by Franklin. The mayor subsequently ordered public safety cuts and imposed 10 percent pay cuts through the furloughs on city workers to balance the budget.

C.T. Martin, who voted against the budget last year, voted Monday for the tax increase because of better communication and information from the mayor’s office.

The budget debate likely will be a factor in the mayoral race.

Councilwoman Mary Norwood, the only major mayoral candidate who had a vote on the budget, sided against the increase. She’s often said she doesn’t trust the city’s numbers, but she did not return calls for comment Monday. Candidate Jesse Spikes accused Norwood in a statement of being a “politics-before-people” elected official.

City Council President Lisa Borders, who votes only if there is a tie, said she supports the increase as “the only choice” to maintain basic services. Another mayoral candidate, state Sen. Kasim Reed (D-Atlanta), wanted a 1 mill increase and the council to make cuts, but was satisfied that the budget will end the furloughs. Candidate Glenn Thomas, a former city employee, said in a statement the tax increase is “irresponsible.”

Chief Financial Officer Jim Glass warned despite Monday’s vote that more cuts may be necessary in the next 90 days, depending on the economy.

Staff writers D.L. Bennett and Rachel Tobin Ramos contributed to this article.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

No recovery for U.S. property markets until 2017

Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:29pm EDT

By Ilaina Jonas

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. urban commercial real estate markets probably will not recover until 2017, the head analyst of commercial mortgages for Deutsche Bank Securities (DBKGn.DE: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) said on Monday.

"The froth is still working itself out," Richard Parkus, Deutsche Bank head of Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities and Asset-Backed Securities Synthetics Research said at the Reuters Global Real Estate Summit in New York. "We are currently in something which is comparable to what we saw in the 1990s and potentially worse."

U.S. commercial real estate values could fall by more than 50 percent from the peak in 2007, he said.

Although asking rents are down about 28 percent in New York, factoring in free rent and other perks by landlords, rents are down about 50 percent, Parkus said.

"Rents will be back to where they were in 2017," Parkus said. Building prices also will take six to eight years to recover, he said.

The U.S. commercial markets are deteriorating at an increasing pace as rent dries up and demand plummets. That is leaving borrowers struggling to make their monthly mortgage payments.

"The number of new loans that are becoming delinquent each month are defaulting at rates between 5 percent and 8 percent per year, with the most loosely underwritten loans of 2007 defaults at 8 percent per year, Parkus said. That puts accumulated losses at about 4 percent this year, and 12 percent over the next four years.

Loans loses ranged between 7 and 11 percent a year during the commercial real estate crash of the early 1990s.

"We are not only not approaching stability, we are at a period of maximum deterioration," Parkus said.

Spanish banks to get €90 billion bailout

From
June 25, 2009

A €90 billion (£76.9 billion) bailout fund for healthy as well as struggling Spanish financial institutions is expected to be approved tomorrow.

The fund, to help banks to restructure, is likely to be supported by the Spanish Cabinet at one of its regular Friday meetings, according to reports.

Cadena Ser radio, which cited a copy of the proposal, said that banks without capital shortages may have access to the fund if they need extra liquidity to improve efficiency.

The bailout plan is not expected to encounter opposition in the Spanish Parliament.

If banks use the fund, they should be open to possible mergers. Government approval to use the fund would be called for only if more than €27 billion were necessary.

As financial institutions crumbled around the world in the credit crunch, Spanish banks managed to avoid toxic debt thanks to careful regulation by the Bank of Spain.

But Spain’s Socialist Government has been forced to launch a rescue fund to save its ailing savings banks, whose bad loans have risen after the collapse of Spain’s decade-long building boom.

Spain’s savings banks have suffered most from the collapse of the property sector after years of lending to property developers and homeowners.

With the construction sector stagnating, many savings banks cannot access private markets and their options for raising capital are limited.

Unusually, local authorities own a large stake in savings banks which critics say stops mergers.

The bailout fund will start with a war chest of €9 billion (£7.6 billion) but could receive an extra €90 billion if necessary.

The move comes after Moody's Investors Service recently downgraded the ratings of 30 Spanish banks and savings banks, citing Spain's economic downturn and a big rise in non-performing loans.

The country's two largest banks, Banco Santander and BBVA, retained their B rating in financial strength and Aa1 rating for long-term debt, but both were placed under review for a possible downgrade in both categories.

Elena Salgado, Spain's Economy Minister, said: “The fund will allow the State to temporarily buy holdings with voting rights.”

Mrs Salgado said that under the rescue plan, the Bank of Spain would have the final say in how public money was handed out and local authorities could not veto mergers.

“This fund would be a last resort,” she said. “First we would call on the banks to use private means to boost capital. Failing that, they would need to use the [private] guarantee fund. Only then would public aid be available.”

Mrs Salgado said no financial institutions were in immediate need of help.

In March, the Bank of Spain was forced to takeover the Caja Castilla La Mancha.

Francisco Gonzalez, the chairman of BBVA, Spain’s second-biggest bank, said that the move was long overdue, with many “zombie” institutions being kept alive artificially, harming the country’s economic growth. “Any short term recovery in lending is made more difficult while in the medium and long term there is a lower potential for economic growth,” he said.

Spain is struggling to cope with its worst recession in decades. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation said this week that the Spanish economy will shrink by 4.2 per cent this year with unemployment rising to 20 per cent in 2010.

Unemployment stands at 17.4 per cent and the Government predicted the economy will contract 3.6 per cent this year.

Profits in the banking sector fell 21.5 per cent in the first quarter of 2009, compared with the same period last year.

Moody's said the non-performing loan rate stood at 4.27 per cent at the end of the first quarter, compared with 0.9 per cent in December 2007.

Maria Jose Mori, Moody's assistant vice-president, said: "The extra cushion ... which has so far protected their earnings and capital bases is becoming increasingly thin."

Moody's downgraded the financial strength ratings of 30 banks and savings banks, eight of them by a full four notches.

A third of the total are now at the D-level or lower.

ECB pumps €442bn into banking system

By Ralph Atkins in Frankfurt, Krishna Guha in Washington and David Oakley in London

Published: June 24 2009 11:05 | Last updated: June 24 2009 23:12

The European Central Bank on Wednesday pumped hundreds of billions of euros in one-year loans into the eurozone’s weakened banking system, making record amounts of emergency finance available in a bid to unlock credit markets and revive the region’s economies.

The move came as the US Federal Reserve pushed back against expectations of an early rise in US interest rates.

In a dramatic step dubbed “stimulus by stealth” in financial markets, the ECB lent €442.2bn for 12 months to more than 1,100 banks at its current benchmark interest rate of 1 per cent.

The high demand for the funds, in what was the ECB’s first ever auction for one-year loans, reflected a growing realisation by the banks that emergency funding may not be available again on such favour-able terms.

The central bank’s action could boost the eurozone’s recovery prospects by lowering market interest rates and creating more scope for banks to lend to the private sector.

On Wednesday night, the Fed left its key fed funds rate unchanged as expected.

It also made no change to its asset purchase plans, but said it “continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period”.

The US central bank said the recession was easing and noted that energy and commodity prices had increased. But it said “substantial resource slack is likely to dampen cost pressures” and it expected that “inflation will remain subdued for some time”.

Global economy thumbnail

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development endorsed the view that the global economy was stabilising, revising upwards its growth forecasts.

It is now forecasting a fall in its 30 member states’ output for 2009 of 4.1 per cent, against its previous forecast of a contraction of 4.3 per cent. It now expects modest growth in 2010, versus a slight fall previously. However, it expects the UK economy to contract by 4.3 per cent this year, down from its earlier prediction of a 3.7 per cent decline, and fail to grow at all in 2010.

The OECD argued that the ECB still had room to cut official eurozone borrowing costs.

Economists said that the ECB’s focus on pumping unlimited liquidity could prove effective in helping engineer a eurozone recovery. The one-year offer at the ECB’s main interest rate of just 1 per cent was “a very smart move in a financial system dominated by banks”, said Elga Bartsch, European economist at Morgan Stanley.

The ECB action, which attracted 1,121 bidders – more than usual in ECB operations – had an immediate impact in driving down overnight and longer-term market interest rates, though the full effects are still to feed through.

Don Smith, economist at inter-dealer broker Icap, said: “The massive scale and undoubted success of this tender almost entirely reflects the cheapness of the funds on offer.”

The previous largest amount injected in a single ECB operation was €348.6bn in December 2007. The economic impact will depend on whether demand for liquidity in future ECB market operations is reduced as a result of Wednesday’s action, as well as whether banks step up lending. “They must pass it along,” Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, an ECB executive board member, said in Rome.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Russia Venezuala found new bank

MOSCOW (AFP) — Russia and Venezuela signed a deal Tuesday to set up a new bank with starting capital of four billion dollars (2.9 billion euros) to fund joint projects as Moscow ramps up its role in South America.

The agreement was signed at Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's residence near Moscow by the deputy finance ministers of the two countries.

"We are moving to a high level of political and economic co-operation," Putin said as he greeted Venezuela's Vice President Ramon Carrizalez, who told Putin there was now a "strategic" partnership between their two countries.

The bank will be 51-percent owned by Russia through the state-controlled lenders VTB and Gazprombank, with the rest going to various Venezuelan partners, Russian Deputy Finance Minister Dmitry Pankin told reporters.

The new bank is due to be created by the end of 2009, Pankin said.

Venezuela is a key partner for Russia in South America, where Moscow is trying to expand its reach mainly through arms and energy deals.

Moscow and Caracas signed arms deals worth 4.4 billion dollars between 2005 and 2007 and Russian energy groups are expanding activities in the country.

Speeding crackdown set for Thursday

Read: Revenue Raiser...


Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Speeders, beware. Law enforcement agencies are planning a speeding crackdown Thursday on I-85, I-75, I-285 and I-20.

The crackdown is part of a campaign by the governor’s office of highway safety.

Recent headlines:

“Our highway safety data shows speed, impaired driving and unbuckled drivers and passengers are still the top three causes of fatality crashes,” director Bob Dallas said.

Also Thursday, DeKalb County starts a monthlong focus on the “Move Over” law.

The law, passed in 2003, requires drivers to change lanes or slow down below the speed limit when approaching a stationary emergency vehicle with lights flashing on the side of the road.

Officials say at least 169 law enforcement officers have been struck and killed by vehicles along American highways since 1997.

MARTA Raises Fairs

For the first time since 2001, MARTA fares are going up. After months of buildup, MARTA’s board of directors has approved a budget including $2 fares, going up from $1.75.

The higher fare will start on Oct. 1.

However, rail service will not be cut back till midnight, as staff had proposed, but will keep going until 1 a.m.

MARTA CEO Beverly Scott said staff found the money to do that by making an accounting change with the money they set aside for retirees’ medical benefits. By putting the money in a restricted account, she said, MARTA can put aside less money without affecting the funds that eventually go to the retirees.

In a work session before the board meeting, board member Steve Stancil argued to scale back the rail service anyway but give Scott the power to restore it at her discretion, since the economy was so uncertain.

Other board members argued that the proposal to stop rail service early drew the biggest complaints from the biggest range of riders, and that going back and forth would cause administrative problems.

“Far, far and away that was the biggest issue people had,” said MARTA board chairman Michael Walls, who heard from riders at public hearings last week. “It cuts across all the classes,” from poorer people returning from late-night jobs to better-off people attending evening events downtown.

Events organizers wrote MARTA a letter last week asking it to reconsider the rail service cutback. The chief operating officer of the Chick-fil-A Bowl addressed the board before its vote Monday to reiterate the message and let them know the negative impact it would have on events.

Along with the 1 a.m. rail service, MARTA staff recommended keeping three sets of buses, after learning the impact to riders would be worse than they thought, extending wait times more than was originally apparent. Those were along Fulton Industrial Boulevard, in the Emory University area, and in Chamblee.

None of that changed the need to reduce service overall to balance MARTA’s budget, so both trains and buses will run less frequently. Also, in location where MARTA charges for parking now, those fees will go up by $1.

MARTA’s budget problems came with the economy. The agency depends partly on a sales tax collected in Fulton and DeKalb counties, and less of it is coming in as people spend less.

Devolution: 20 Predictions

(June 23, 2009)


As cities, counties and states default on their obligations and unemployment insurance runs out, devolution sets in.


While some see a collapse of society in our future, right now I see devolution, not revolution. Devolution is both the process of degeneration and the surrender of governmental powers from central authorities to local authorities.

Devolution will take many forms. The key driver behind devolution is simple: there's not enough money to fund the status quo, so something has to be cut, axed, trimmed or devolved. Examples already abound: the number of school days in the year are reduced to shave expenses, two-times-a-week trash pickup is cut to once a week, etc.

The key constraint on devolution is also simple: the status quo power structure must be left intact. Nobody will willingly surrender their power, so devolution means services and front-end expenses will be cut in order to protect back-end administrative powers.

Thus public union bosses won't be suffering any big cuts in pay or benefits, and neither will their municipal and state administration counterparts. (Of course there will be symbolic cuts for PR purposes, but nothing deep.) What will be cut is part-time librarians, custodians, county park staff, etc.--the powerless people who actually serve the public.

As the states run out of money, they will surrender some limited powers to local authorities as a mechanism for ridding their budgets of certain costs. As cities and counties go broke, then they will devolve some modest authority to non-profit groups or volunteers.

As laid off workers' unemployment insurance runs out (yes, even the extensions run out as the states' UI funds drain to zero) then their lifestyles devolve/degrade: first, eating out and vacations go, then new clothing, then the second car, then college, then the house, and so on.

Devolution is a painful process, but the State (all government at all levels) and the Plutocracy (owners of capital and productive assets) vastly prefer devolution to revolution because devolution doesn't threaten the current status quo/Powers That Be at all.

Devolution depends on humanity's innate ability to habituate to nearly anything. Thus humans somehow adapt to concentration camps, bitter cold, intolerable heat, mind-numbing work, etc., especially if the new environment is introduced over time in stages.

Thus the middle class household might actually respond with an anger deep and hot enough to become political if their middle-class lifestyle was taken away in one swoop. But devolution insures that the process is akin to the famous analogy of the boiled frog: if the temperature of the water is increased slowly enough, the frog never notices (or so the story goes) that he is being boiled alive.

The middle class household forced to sell everything and move (surreptitiously) into a storage locker or into an RV will feel a shock of recognition that all has been lost, and that perhaps forces beyond their own personal decisions might be at work: forces which benefitted from Federal bailouts, for instance, in a way they can never hope to. (That $150 billion transferred through AIG to Goldman Sachs would have funded a very large national unemployment insurance pool.)

But if their middle class life is taken away from them over time, in pieces, they will habituate to each loss without any political enlightenment; they have fully internalized the MSM propaganda (and recall the mass media is owned by less than 10 global corporations) that the "problem" is their own, not "the system's."

A revolution occurs when great numbers of people realize that the system benefits the Powers That Be, not the citizenry, despite the PTB's constant assurances that this is the very best system on Earth.

So the surest way to secure one's lofty privileges and powers is to convince the people who have lost everything that it's all their own fault; if they were just smarter, possessed more degrees, had better judgment, weren't hooked on anti-depressants, etc., then they would be jolly, wealthy, etc.

In a similar fashion, local government will attempt to manage the degeneration of their services in such a way that the public does not realize it's being boiled. If the trains and buses all stopped running, people might be angry enough to turn off their TVs and demand some actual, real political change. But if services are slowly degraded over time, the public will sigh and habituate to it.

Meanwhile, the police chief, mayor, union bigwigs, et al. will be driving by in their chauffeured vehicles, making sure "the little people" are swallowing the devolution whole. The politicos' Masters, the Plutocracy who fund their campaigns, will fill their coffers at election time as long as nothing rocks the boat. If the citizenry gets restive, then the politicos will find their funding drying up (Heaven forbid!).

Here are some random devolution predictions for the coming year or three. Many are already visible, so the "prediction" is simply a recognition of a rising trend.

1. Listings on craigslist announcing the selling/giving away of the entire contents of storage lockers will rise.

2. The number of people living in storage lockers "illegally" will rise.

3. Citizens with numerous outstanding traffic tickets will abandon their vehicles when "booted" (locked) by cities as the cars are worth less that the fines due. Cities will start auctioning/scrapping hundreds of abandoned vehicles.

3. The dumping of abandoned clothing, furniture, old computer equipment, etc. on sidewalks and public parks/byways will increase dramatically.

4. Homeless camps will appear in parks and locales which were previously considered off-limits to such public poverty.

5. The number of citizens cited/arrested for unpaid moving and parking violations will rise; judges will begin dismissing the amounts due as the citizens before them have no means of paying the huge fines.

6. Government at all levels will devote increasing resources to revenue collection; new laws giving the State (all levels of government) new powers to stripmine private assets will be passed with strong support from government-dependent special-interests.

7. Government at all levels will assign domestic intelligence assets to the search for additional tax revenues; these actions will be strictly secret.

8. A major sports franchise or two will declare bankruptcy.

9. Spontaneous protests (over evictions, reductions in service, etc.) will increase both in frequency and in the number of participants.

10. Tourism will devolve to visiting relatives and/or car camping; hotels and restaurants in tourist-dependent locales will start closing in ever increasing numbers. Only the top 10% "high-caste" professional and government-technocrat class will be able to travel overseas.

11. Cities and corporations which were previously considered immune to the "recession" will declare losses and huge layoffs.

12. Houses which were snapped up in 2009 for $350,000 on the basis that they once sold for $550,00 will be auctioned for less than $200,000 in late 2010.

13. Local governments outside of the Rust Belt will start aggressively taking over abandoned houses as banks fail and ownership of the properties becomes ambiguous.

14. Local government fines, fees, permits and other business-related licensing will plummet, decimating what was once considered a "safe" revenue stream.

15. State and local government services will rapidly devolve: twice-a-week trash pickup will devolve to once a week; fire stations, libraries and schools will be consolidated; other services will become sporadic.

16. State and local government hikes in fees to use parks, park downtown, drop junk at the dump, get a building permit, etc. will backfire: people will stop going to parks, stop shopping downtown, start dumping junk at night on quiet streets now that the dump is too expensive and start remodeling without permits. Contrary to government expectations, revenues will actually drop faster after all these fees are raised.

17. Church/temple/mosque attendance will rise, as will participation in church/temple/mosque events.

18. Major rock/pop concert tours will be cancelled due to low ticket sales; acts which were "guaranteed to mint millions" wll be forced to cancel their tours.

19. Veterinarians will demand cash to examine pets; people will increasingly be unable to pay for costly procedures for their pets (teeth cleaning, hip replacements, chemotherapy, etc.). Vets will consolidate/close their doors.

20. State/county attempts to openly raise taxes will increasingly trigger tax rebellions and demonstrations; the trickle of residents leaving high-tax states and counties will grow to a flood.

Bonus prediction: California's current deficit of $24 billion will widen by another $10 billion in 2010. What was once considered "impossible"--state default on bonds, pensions and much else--will come to be viewed as inevitable.

The political propaganda which infuses every moment of our lives tries to maintain an artificial distinction between our Tweedledum and Tweedledee political parties: The Dees are all for using the power of the State (all government) to "help the little people" while the Dums are all for unleashing the power of free enterprise, a.k.a. the 1% who control the capital and 2/3 of all productive assets in the nation (the Plutocracy).

The truth is that the State and the Plutocracy are two sides of one coin; each rules with the support and complicity of the other. The distinction drawn between them is a useful distraction, somewhat like drawing a distinction between professional sports teams who swap players in the off-season. "My team" is an abstraction which serves the goal of enriching its owners; "fan" loyalty draws smirks from everyone in the know even as they proclaim "fan day" and "fan appreciation day." (The crosstown rival team is of course "the hated enemy.")

As we watch devolution in action over the next few years, observe how it is managed so the hapless frog won't jump from the pot. That is what they're counting on, of course; a devolution passively accepted by a media-duped, gadget-addicted, self-blaming, depressed, drugged-out populace.

Put another way: devolution is what happens while the Delusionol (tm) wears off.

How To Rob The Treasury For Bonuses

Karl Denninger
Market Ticker
Jun 24, 2009

You have to love Goldman Sachs:
[Goldman to make record bonus payout -Guardian 21 Jun 2009]

"...Goldman Sachs staff can look forward to the biggest bonus payouts in the firm's 140-year history after a spectacular first half of the year, sparking concern that the big investment banks which survived the credit crunch will derail financial regulation reforms.

"A lack of competition and a surge in revenues from trading foreign currency, bonds and fixed-income products has sent profits at Goldman Sachs soaring, according to insiders at the firm."

Nothing like a little taxpayer money funneled through AIG to add to the pool, right?

"In April, Goldman said it would set aside half of its £1.2bn first-quarter profit to reward staff, much of it in bonuses. It is believed to have paid 973 bankers $1m or more last year, while this year's payouts are on track to be the highest for most of the bank's 28,000 staff, including about 5,400 in London."

Let's remember that Goldman got roughly $10 billion in AIG-funneled money to "settle" CDS that their CEO said was a fully-hedged position and which would have had no material impact if AIG had gone down, mostly because they had collected nearly all of the hedge before AIG got in serious trouble.

That is, they got paid twice - once with their hedge (good move guys) and again by government fiat, directed by Henry Paulson who coincidentally used to run Goldman.

Also note the size of the first-quarter profit, multiply by four (assuming equally good results) and then compare against the "extra" payout through AIG to figure out whether there would be any bonus pool absent that payment.

Looks to me like the US Taxpayer is funding all of Goldman's bonuses, never mind this ditty:

"Last week, the firm predicted that President Barack Obama's government could issue $3.25tn of debt before September, almost four times last year's sum. Goldman, a prime broker of US government bonds, is expected to make hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from selling and dealing in the bonds."

Nice, eh? Do Treasury's bidding, get paid for it, get an extra $10 billion from the taxpayer as a gift to cover a bet you had already hedged against default, and pocket it all.

Change we can believe in - yep, we'll steal even more than we did under The Bush Administration!

Disclosure: No related company-specific positions.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Fleecing Just Goes On and On...

Staff at Goldman Sachs staff can look forward to the biggest bonus payouts in the firm's 140-year history after a spectacular first half of the year, sparking concern that the big investment banks which survived the credit crunch will derail financial regulation reforms.

A lack of competition and a surge in revenues from trading foreign currency, bonds and fixed-income products has sent profits at Goldman Sachs soaring, according to insiders at the firm.

Staff in London were briefed last week on the banking and securities company's prospects and told they could look forward to bumper bonuses if, as predicted, it completed its most profitable year ever. Figures next month detailing the firm's second-quarter earnings are expected to show a further jump in profits. Warren Buffett, who bought $5bn of the company's shares in January, has already made a $1bn gain on his investment.

Goldman is expected to be the biggest winner in the race for revenues that, in 2006, reached £186bn across the entire industry. While this figure is expected to fall to £160bn in 2009, it will be split among a smaller number of firms.

Barclays Capital, Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank are among the European firms expected to register bumper profits, along with US banks JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley following the near collapse and government rescue of major trading houses including Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, UBS and Royal Bank of Scotland.

In April, Goldman said it would set aside half of its £1.2bn first-quarter profit to reward staff, much of it in bonuses. It is believed to have paid 973 bankers $1m or more last year, while this year's payouts are on track to be the highest for most of the bank's 28,000 staff, including about 5,400 in London.

Critics of the bonus culture in the City said the dominance of a few risk-taking investment banks is undermining the efforts of regulators to stabilise the financial system.

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat treasury spokesman, said: "The investment banks more than any other institutions created the culture of excessive leverage, excessive risk and excessive bonuses that led to the downfall of the financial system. Now they are cashing in and the same bonus culture has returned. The result must be that we are being pushed to the edge of another crash."

Goldman Sachs said it reviewed its bonus scheme last year and switched from a system of guaranteed rewards that were paid over three years to variable payments that tied staff to the firm. It told employees last year that profit-related bonuses would be delayed by 12 months.

Until the release of its first quarter profits in April, it seemed inconceivable that a firm owing the US government $10bn would be looking to break all-time records in 2009.

David Williams, an investment banking analyst at Fox Pitt Kelton, said: "This year is shaping up to be the best year ever for investment banks, or at least those that have emerged relatively unscathed from the credit crisis.

"These banks are intermediaries in the bond markets where governments and companies are raising billions of pounds of new money. There is also a lack of competition that means they can charge huge sums for doing business."

Last week, the firm predicted that President Barack Obama's government could issue $3.25tn of debt before September, almost four times last year's sum. Goldman, a prime broker of US government bonds, is expected to make hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from selling and dealing in the bonds.

Clunker

June 18 (Bloomberg) — A $106 billion war-spending bill won final congressional approval after the Senate voted to retain a “cash for clunkers” provision aimed at helping the auto industry.

Action by the Senate today sends the measure to President Barack Obama for his signature. The Senate passed the bill on a 91 to 5 vote; the House approved the measure earlier this week.

Senator Judd Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, led the effort to drop a provision providing as much as $4,500 to people who trade in their vehicles for more fuel-efficient models. He said the plan, which would cost $1 billion, was a poor use of tax dollars when the government is projected to run its biggest budget deficit since 1945.

“It is a clunker,” Gregg said of the plan. “Why should our children and our grandchildren have to pay the bill” for the government subsidizing “somebody to buy their car today? How fiscally irresponsible is that?” he said.

Senator Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat, said the proposal was needed to help auto dealers hit by an “economic tsunami.” She said the plan would “help those who have been having an extremely difficult time just holding their head above water.”

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Back in the U.S.S.A.

Peter Schiff
Jun 19, 2009

Harry Browne, the former Libertarian Party candidate for president, used to say: "the government is great at breaking your leg, handing you a crutch, and saying 'You see, without me you couldn't walk.'" That maxim is clearly illustrated by the financial industry regulatory reforms proposed this week by the Obama Administration.

In seeking to undo the damage inflicted over the past decade by misguided government policies, the new regulatory regime would ensure that the problems underlying our financial system will only get worse. As was the case with the deeply flawed Sarbanes-Oxley legislation of 2002, or the misguided provisions of the Patriot Act of 2001, such as the torturous anti-money laundering requirements, the move will further burden the financial services industry with unnecessary regulation that will drive up costs, lower quality, and shelter the biggest and least innovative companies. Ultimately, the structure will put the entire U.S. financial industry at a global competitive disadvantage.

The underlying problem is that the excessive risk taking which brought about the crisis was not market-driven, but a direct consequence of government interference with risk-inhibiting market forces. Rather than learning from its mistakes and allowing market forces to once again control risks and efficiently allocate resources, the government is merely repeating its mistakes on a grander scale - thereby sowing the seeds for an even greater crisis in the future.

As is typical of government attempts to control economic outcomes, Obama's plans focus on the symptoms of the disease and not the cause. The American financial system imploded for two reasons: cheap money and moral hazard - both of which were supplied by the government. Under the proposed new regulatory structures, these toxic ingredients will be combined in ever-increasing quantities.

The proposals most notably involve extra regulatory oversight of financial entities that the government deems "too big to fail." This implies that it is desirable to have such entities in the first place, and that the government will continue to back those large organizations that fall under its protection. These "too big to fail" firms will enjoy a competitive advantage over smaller firms in attracting capital, as lenders will perceive zero risk in extending them credit. This will cause these firms to grow even larger, producing even greater systemic risks and larger losses when the next round of bailouts arrives. Meanwhile, smaller firms which seek to expand, and which propose no systemic risks, will face greater challenges as higher capital costs render them less competitive.

If the government did not provide these bailouts or guarantees, then the market itself would ensure organizations did not grow beyond their ability to attract capital. It is only when market discipline is overcome by government guarantees that systemic risks arise.

Obama proposes to entrust the critical job of "systemic risk regulator" to the Federal Reserve, the very organization that has proven most adept at creating systemic risk. This is like making Keith Richards the head of the DEA.

Given the Federal Reserve's disastrous monetary policy over the past decade, any attempt to expand the Fed's role should be vigorously opposed. Through decades of short-sighted interest rate decisions, the Fed has proven time and again that it is only able to close the barn door after the entire herd has escaped. If setting interest rates had been left to the free market, none of the excesses we have seen in the credit market would have been remotely possible.

The perverse result will be that our government and the Fed gain more power as a direct result of their own incompetence. Such was also the case with Freddie and Fannie, which should have been allowed to fail, but were nationalized instead, leaving them in a position to do even more damage. The new round of regulations ignores them completely. Along those lines, ratings agencies such as Standard and Poor's and Moody's that completely missed the mark were also spared. Perhaps this special treatment is a way of ensuring that the Treasury debt maintains its bogus AAA rating.

Unfortunately, despite their intent, my guess is that the new regulations will most severely impact smaller firms, like my own, that never engaged in reckless behavior. This will further reward those "too big to fail" firms, whose economies of scale and cozy relationships with regulators leave them better positioned than their smaller rivals to absorb the costs of the added red tape.

With the transition now fully under way, I propose we end the pretense and rename our country: "The United Socialist States of America." In fact, given all the czars already in Washington, we might as well go with the Russian theme completely: appoint a Politburo, move into dilapidated housing blocks, and parade our missiles in the streets. On the bright side, there's always the borscht.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Shanghai Co-operation Organisation

By Michael Hudson

Published: June 15 2009 03:00 | Last updated: June 15 2009 03:00

Challenging the American empire will be the focus of meetings in Yekaterinburg, Russia, today and tomorrow for Chinese President Hu Jintao, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and other leaders of the six-nation Shanghai Co-operation Organisation. The alliance comprises Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajiki-stan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, with observer status for Iran, India, Pakistan and Mongolia.

The attendees (who will be joined on Tuesday by Brazil for trade discussions) have assured American diplomats that dismantling the US financial and military hegemony is not their aim. They simply want to discuss mutual aid - but in a way that has no role for the US or for the dollar as a vehicle for trade among these countries.

The meeting is an opportunity for China, Russia and India to "build an increasingly multipolar world order", as Mr Medvedev put it in a St Petersburg speech this month. What he meant was this: we have reached our limit in subsidising the US military encirclement of Eurasia while also allowing the US to appropriate our exports, companies and real estate in exchange for paper money of questionable worth.

An "artificially maintained unipolar system", Mr Medvedev said, was based on "one big centre of consumption, financed by a growing deficit, and thus growing debts, one formerly strong reserve currency, and one dominant system of assessing assets and risks".

Keen observers of America, if not effective managers of their own economies, these countries argue that the root of the global financial crisis is that the US makes too little and spends too much. Especially upsetting is US military expenditure - such as military aid to Georgia or the presence in the oil-rich Middle East and central Asia - using money that foreign central banks recycle.

Overconsumption by US citizens, US buy-outs of foreign companies and dollars the Pentagon spends abroad all end up in foreign central banks. These governments face a hard choice: either recycle the dollars back to America by buying US Treasury bonds or let the "free market" force up their currencies relative to the dollar - thereby pricing their exports out of world markets, creating domestic unemployment and business failures. US-style free markets hook them into a system that forces them to accept unlimited dollars. Now they want out.

This means creating an alternative. Rather than making merely "cosmetic changes as some countries and perhaps the international financial organisations themselves might want", Mr Medvedev concluded his St Petersburg speech: "What we need are financial institutions of a completely new type, where particular political issues and motives, and particular countries, will not dominate."

For starters, the six countries intend to trade in their own currencies so as to get the benefit of mutual credit, rather than give it to the US. In recent months China has struck bilateral deals with Brazil and Malaysia to trade in renminbi rather than the dollar, sterling or euros.

Many foreigners see the US as a lawless nation. How else to characterise a country that holds out a set of laws for others - on war, debt repayment and the treatment of prisoners - but ignores them itself?

The US is the world's largest debtor, yet has avoided the pain of "structural adjustments" imposed on other debtor nations. US interest rate and tax reductions in the face of exploding trade and budget deficits are seen as the height of hypocrisy in view of the austerity programmes that the "Washington consensus" has forced on other countries via the International Monetary Fund and other vehicles. The US tells debtor economies to sell off their public utilities and natural resources, raise their interest rates and increase taxes while gutting their social safety nets to squeeze out money to pay creditors.

It is no mystery to other countries how the US remains above the law. Foreigners see a financial system backed by American aircraft carriers and military bases encircling the globe. The IMF, World Bank, World Trade Organisation and other Washington surrogates are seen as vestiges of a lost American empire no longer able to rule by economic strength, left only with military domination.

The countries that are gathering today are convinced that this hegemony cannot continue without adequate revenues and are attempting to hasten the bankruptcy of the US financial-military world order. If China, Russia and their allies have their way, the US will no longer live off the savings of others, nor have the money for unlimited military spending.

US officials wanted to attend Yekaterinburg as observers. They were told no. It is a word that Americans will hear much more in the future.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Property Rights Take a Hit


Peter Schiff
Jun 13, 2009

"Crony capitalism" is a term often applied to foreign nations where government interference circumvents market forces. The practice is widely associated with tin-pot dictators and second-rate economies. In such a system, support for the ruling regime is the best and only path to economic success. Who you know supersedes what you know, and favoritism trumps the rule of law. Unfortunately, this week's events demonstrate that the phrase now more aptly describes our own country.

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from Chrysler's secured creditors based on the government's argument that the needs of other stakeholders outweighed those of a few creditors. In this case, the Administration concluded the interests of the United Auto Workers outweighed the interests of the Indiana teachers and firemen whose pension fund sued to block the restructuring. Given the enormous financial support that the UAW poured into the Obama campaign, such partiality is hardly surprising.

When making their investment in Chrysler just a few months ago, the Indiana pension fund agreed to commit capital because of the specific assurances received from the company. In allowing this sham bankruptcy to be crammed through the courts, we have shredded the vital principal of the rule of law, and have become a nation of men, rather than one of laws.

The risk that legal contracts can now be arbitrarily set aside will make investors think twice before committing capital to distressed corporations. Oftentimes enforcing contracts imposes hardships. That's precisely why we have contracts.

Without absolute faith that deals will be honored, it will be extremely difficult for U.S. companies to borrow money. This will be particularly true for those companies already struggling with too much debt. Without the ability to issue secured debt, how will such companies access the necessary capital to turn around? If secured creditors cannot count on the courts to enforce their claims, they will not put their capital at risk. What good is being a secured creditor if courts can allow the assets securing your claim to be sold for the benefit of others?

Another problem with the government imposing losses on secured Chrysler creditors is that in its bailouts of financial companies (like Citigroup and AIG), the government took steps to specifically pay back creditors, even when those creditors should have been wiped out. This inconsistency and lack of equal protection further undermines faith in our economy.

The message here is clear: loan money to financial entities with friends in Washington and no matter how risky the loan, taxpayers will bail you out if it goes bad. However, loan money to a unionized manufacturer, even if prudently secured by real assets, and you have as much chance of getting your money back as finding Jimmy Hoffa's body.

As if this wasn't bad enough, testimony on Thursday from former Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis revealed a concerted effort on the part of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to pressure Lewis into hiding relevant financial information regarding Merrill Lynch losses from B of A shareholders. Recently released e-mails make it clear that the government threatened to remove corporate leaders if they failed to go through with the merger and keep quiet about the losses.

Again, the justification for the interference seemed to be the "greater economic good" the merger would serve. The right of B of A shareholders to be informed that their company was about to buy a financial black hole was clearly considered to be an acceptable sacrifice.

More importantly, the fact that two of the highest-ranking government officials can conspire to violate both securities laws and private property rights is abhorrent to everything America supposedly stands for. If they get away with it, which I believe they will, the precedent and the message will be chilling.

As a broker who specializes in foreign investments, I am always wary of political risk. I must consider how the threat of arbitrary government action could undermine the value of my investments. However, recent events show that political risk is now greater here than abroad, and U.S. assets, which have historically traded at premium valuations based on faith in our legal system, will soon trade at discounts to reflect this new threat. The fear of having contracts abrogated or property rights violated when doing so serves some contrived greater good will substantially raise our cost of capital and further reduce our competitiveness.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Theater of the Absurd:

A View From the Inside

BY ROB KIRBY | may 18, 2009

I read an article that was published by The Institutional Risk Analyst [IRA] titled, Kabuki on the Potomac: Reforming Credit Default Swaps and OTC Derivatives. According to the Kabuki article,

"Kabuki is classical ancient Japanese folk theater performed broadly and loudly for the general public. I became familiar with it when I lived in Tokyo years ago. Kabuki on the Potomac this week fit Kabuki's theatrical definition with lawmakers wailing loudly, uttering angry threats, and rhythmically pounding podiums in a performance of mangled metaphors and fantasy."

An article about derivatives whose title is drawn from Japanese folk theater, law makers wailing loudly, angry threats, mangled metaphors and fantasy sounded like it might contain a few kernels of truth, piqued my interest, so I read it. I took issue with the thrust of the article and contacted the folks at Institutional Risk Analysis and told them I thought their article was “missing it” – to me, characterizing the ongoing derivatives debacle as a big mistake.

To their credit, one of the principals at IRA responded, asking me what “it” was that they were missing.

This is how I replied:

Your article mistakenly cites CDSs as the epicenter of the derivatives mess. The rest of the derivatives are only referred to as “other OTC derivatives”.

“Despite bringing the world economy to its knees and costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts for events such as Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and American International Group (NYSE:AIG), the Masters of the Universe who run the largest Wall Street firms of have learned not a thing when it comes to credit default swaps ("CDS") and other types of high-risk financial engineering. Indeed, not only are the largest derivative dealers fighting efforts to reform the CDS and other derivative instruments that caused the AIG fiasco, but regulators like the Federal Reserve Board and US Treasury are working with the banks to ensure that a small group of dealers increase their monopoly over the business of over-the-counter ("OTC") derivatives.

Why such a desperate battle for the OTC derivatives markets? For the world's largest banks, the OTC derivatives markets are the last remaining source of supra-normal profits - and also perhaps the single largest source of systemic risk in the global financial markets. Without OTC derivatives, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG would never have failed, but without the excessive rents earned by JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) and the remaining legacy OTC dealers, the largest banks cannot survive. No matter how good an operator JPM CEO Jamie Dimon may be, his bank is DOA without its near-monopoly in OTC derivatives -- yet that same business may eventually destroy JPM.”

Your article asks about or suggests that there was a desperate “battle” in the OTC derivatives market, but then speaks in terms of it being about J.P. Morgan wanting or needing to earn excessive rents to survive.

This completely misses the mark. You have not identified “the major” contributor of this excess AT ALL.

Look at the concentration of derivatives as reported by the OCC:

0518.01

66+ of 91 Trillion notional at J.P. M. is interest rate exposure. 22+ of 34 Trillion at Citi the same. 16+ Trillion of 32 at B of A. And all your article mentions is CDS???

Much of these interest rate derivatives are interest rate swaps [IRS]. IRS > 3yrs. duration typically have U.S. government bond trades embedded in them. Total outstanding U.S. debt is 11 or so Trillion. So, ask yourself why all this trading when there is DEMONSTRABLY NO end user demand for this stuff:

0518.02

If you follow John Williams’ work – www.shadowstats.com you know that official inflation reporting is “jacked beyond belief”. The interest rate FRAUD goes hand-in-hand.

The creation of this interest rate DEBACLE is tantamount to the GROSS mis-pricing of capital which all other economic excess [including the tech boom, real-estate boom and CDS extravaganza] stemmed from.

Additionally, given the size of J.P. Morgan’s derivatives book and the fact that the contents thereof have crippled or killed other institutions with fractions of their exposure, other BIGGER questions should be asked. When you read the following – given what is already known - it should make one wonder if accounting even happens at J.P. Morgan:

First reported by Dawn Kopecki back in 2006 when she reported in BusinessWeek Online in a piece titled, Intelligence Czar Can Waive SEC Rules,

"President George W. Bush has bestowed on his [then] intelligence czar, John Negroponte, broad authority, in the name of national security, to excuse publicly traded companies from their usual accounting and securities-disclosure obligations. Notice of the development came in a brief entry in the Federal Register, dated May 5, 2006, that was opaque to the untrained eye."

What this means folks, if institutions like J.P. Morgan are deemed to be integral to U.S. National Security - they could be "legally" excused from reporting their true financial condition.

The entry in the Federal Register is described as follows:

The memo Bush signed on May 5, which was published seven days later in the Federal Register, had the unrevealing title "Assignment of Function Relating to Granting of Authority for Issuance of Certain Directives: Memorandum for the Director of National Intelligence." In the document, Bush addressed Negroponte, saying: "I hereby assign to you the function of the President under section 13(b)(3)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended."

A trip to the statute books showed that the amended version of the 1934 act states that "with respect to matters concerning the national security of the United States," the President or the head of an Executive Branch agency may exempt companies from certain critical legal obligations. These obligations include keeping accurate "books, records, and accounts" and maintaining "a system of internal accounting controls sufficient" to ensure the propriety of financial transactions and the preparation of financial statements in compliance with "generally accepted accounting principles."

The CDS Fraud that your article identifies is a “side show” which deflects attention away from the more heinous crime committed with “neutering usury” thereby allowing the U.S. Treasury and Private Federal Reserve to “scapegoat” mostly non-bank entities like AIG, Bear, Lehman and YOUR grandmother as soon as they figure out a way to blame her too!

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Welcome To The New Banana Republic Of The United States of America and Black Markets.

Government Outlaws

Welcome To The New Banana Republic Of The United States of America and Black Markets.

We would not, under any circumstances, believe our government would make decisions flying in the face of sacred United States contract law. What they have done to auto company bondholders is to favor unions for political votes forcing bondholders into a lower, non-preferred payment order. This says corporate contracts in the United States are now meaningless.Auto union people were moved to the head of the bankruptcy line while bondholders with a preferred first lien position by CONTRACT LAW, are now forced to the end of the line.

If your government will do this to auto bondholders, what will they do to the Sheeple?

News this morning told of GM bondholders finally reaching a settlement providing $.17 on the dollar in two parts as GM shares trading was halted. Further news stated GM shareholders are receiving 1% of the deal. Watch for a following clarification as to what all this might mean.

In Our View It’s All Just Grave Dancing

We expect Chrysler for sure and GM being a strong maybe, to enter their final resting places in the automobile manufacturing graveyard. For these companies to survive, they have to build and sell cars. We project years of falling vehicle sales with more lean years afterward. We think they have zero chance to continue in business in the longer view. Ford has a long shot chance to survive IF they can downsize the company another 35-50%. We would suggest their chances are one in three to get through it all and expect their bankruptcy as well. If Ford makes it, Chapter 11 comes first.

I just saw a report that FDR taxes in the 1930’s were temporarily as high as 80-90%. I have not confirmed this but pass it along for what it’s worth. Destruction of wealth by the Obama administration is moving breathtakingly faster in escalation mode reinforcing Marc Faber’s prediction of certain hyperinflation.

Should the Federal Reserve stop their reliquification-reflation program, the whole system could cave-in overnight. So far, they’ve tossed roughly $2 Trillion of taxpayer cash at all these problems but Bill Gross at Pimco says they must inject a total of $6 Trillion to begin to cover the messes creating a recovery market reaction.

We would expect a world-wide systemic crack-up at around $4 Trillion as key components of the global credit and bond markets in Europe, Asia and the U.S. will simply not be able to take it. Our expectations for the next 90 days are for convoluted choppy markets with a mild stocks’ selling event in the shorter term.

After Labor Day, this fall, we forecast a false stock market rise followed by most professional traders selling into strength with ferocity. September, 2009 30-year bond futures are trading this morning at 115.12. Next support is 112.50, 110.00, 108.00 and then 106.00. Our longer range forecast is 80.00 with larger potential for something much worse. We told our readers it gets scary when the 30’s sink under 120.00. Well folks we have arrived.

Our new forecast for later September, 2009 through early October would be a 62% crash from the early fall high. This means a selling event of at least 4-6,000 points lower on the Dow Jones.

Numerous Reasons For System Failure

The big U.S. investment banks wrote crooked deals (derivatives) destroying our financial system. Our Federal Reserve (not federal at all but composed of these same crooked bankers) along with the U.S. Treasury have stolen nearly a trillion to replenish the banks’ capital and financial footing.

Those banks were supposed to lend the money to make the economy find support and rally. Most of these funds have been bank-held to meet capital-to-loan ratios. No loans; no help for businesses.

A further expansion of (TARP), The Troubled Asset Relief Program, will be expanded to cover U.S. states’ budgets shortfalls. The worst example of this problem is California. Obama when asked if he would bailout California said, “No.” This means they get bailed out along with several others crying and pleading for help after recklessly spending their individual states into the fiscal ground.

Many of these idiotic state governments have still not made any serious moves to cut spending. They keep expecting the gravy train to continue on forever. It won’t as the tax revenue crashes.

The administrations’ policies cover funding of two current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with a new expansion into a third in Pakistan. Potentially, additional wars will open with North Korea and increased action relative to the forthcoming Israeli-Iranian nuclear conflict. We not only cannot afford all these war costs, but do not have the men, women and equipment to manage all of this war-mongering simultaneously.

In our view, enemies of the US are determined to pull us into several wars, and drain the US Treasury destroying America and turning its residents into rural serfs and economic slaves. They seem to be getting a good head start.

We suspect the increased aggression from North Korea is a test to see how Obama manages foreign policy. Since he has no foreign policy except to waffle and hide under the covers and wish it would all go away, these conflicts and new international tensions shall escalate. In our view, this is a lot worse than our economic problems.

Our country is at risk floating in an ocean of disasters with no captain at the helm. Neighborhood organization as a vocation is quite different in scale than leading the engagement of international conflicts going potentially nuclear. Mr. Obama giving the visiting U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown some plastic gift K-Mart DVD’s was a strong and meaningful signal this kid is way out of his league.

U.S. housing mortgages of several toxic varieties began their final descent in June, 2005 when we predicted the housing crash. At that date lumber futures tipped-over and the handwriting was on the wall. With skidding lumber prices and Mr. Greenspan’s cash giveaway on the table, the only final solution was a housing meltdown. We were correct in our predictions and the worst is yet to come.

Contrary to current Pollyannish opinions, housing cannot see a new base until 2012 at the earliest, in our view. In recent days we were wondering out loud thinking this might be too optimistic. Our latest forecast is for housing to fall another 30% nationwide on the national averages.

Obviously, some false green shoots appear randomly as bottom feeders bargain hunt, but 95% of America is dead housing hay turning rotten and moldy. This summer in some down-trodden urban areas, housing hay catches fire in an escalation of riots and violence. This is not the preferred method of urban renewal.

Builders are currently operating at 25% of normal capacity. Our new forecast says this number sinks to 10% of the formerly 1.7mm new homes per year; building 170,000 homes annually if they are lucky.

Automobile sales for North American cars and trucks sank from 17mm to roughly 9mm. Our new forecast is a further skid to 5mm. This is why Chrysler, GM and probably Ford cannot survive.

National US unemployment is now officially posted between 8% and 10% depending upon the poll- takers. In our view, current national unemployment is 20%. In Michigan, the rate is 24% and will soon be 30% after the auto manufacturer bankruptcies take hold later this year. In the 1930’s, 25% unemployed was the worst number posted and it was probably accurate.

For a Greater Depression low, national US unemployment could hit 35% with Michigan at 40-45% before World War III provides military employment for millions more.

War is the usual path to finally escape the trauma of depression. This was true in the pre-US Civil War depressions of 1840-1843 and in the early 1850’s. Preceding WW I we had the Panic of 1907 and its previous US depression of the early 1890’s. We had a preceding 1930’s depression in 1920-1921. This was followed by the 1930’s depression and then World War II finally taking us out of it.

On the K-Wave cycle timeline, our current depression was to begin in 2000. And, in fact it did with the crash of the Nasdaq but was artificially delayed by Mr. Greenspan’s billions of free cash and low interest rate pump-priming. His market interference helped delay the inevitable and cause worse conditions to last much longer. While there is open debate that 2000 repeats 1930 or, in fact it was delayed ten years to 2010, smart analysts compare the chart overlays of 2000-2010 with the 1930’s and they are scarily identical.

Consumers are busted and broken. Unemployment is rampant and escalating daily. Wages are stagnant to down. Homes, cars and other property are being repossessed. Hundreds of thousands of homeless people are living in cars, tent cities and on the beaches of warmer states. Consumer credit is shot. Families are doubling and tripling up to survive. Some households have only one person with a job feeding several. Consumers have lost most of their buying power. They represented 70% of the economy. There is no engine of growth to produce any economic rebound that we can see.

Welfare caseloads are skyrocketing and some states’ funds are nearly empty. Elderly are eating dog food to afford utility bills. Many will die in this forthcoming hot summer and freezing post-crash winter. Meanwhile governments are not equipped to help as they are disorganized. They all have food and money but no logical organization or distribution means. This suggests millions go hungry while stacks of food reside in warehouses as beltway idiots say things are better and do nothing.

The Sheeple are girding for economic and potentially civil war. Gun and ammunition sales are off-the-charts. Tea parties are growing. The next stage will be street violence confrontations and more civil disobedience. Governmental pushback will only incite more riots and escalate troubles. States are releasing inmates from over-crowded prisons to save money. Crime shall soon go to the moon.

Meanwhile, our president is flying to Las Vegas (where he told others not to visit), to politic and raise funds for the party. He supposes his current Supreme Court nominee will ethnically encourage large Nevada donations to his party. Maybe it will but we also heard news reports of widespread suspicion of this move in the Latin community. More of the voters are catching onto these political games; from both parties. Politics exists to hold power, control the Sheeple and take their money for vote promotion. That is all it is pure and simple. Will we see a new and more voter responsive third party?

In the forthcoming mid-term elections, we would suggest administration powerbrokers get a hard lesson at the 2010 polls followed by something infinitely most harsh on the streets. People vote with their pocketbooks and today and into the longer range future, those wallets are empty. Beware!

This is not a game nor is it a passing bump in the road. This dire situation presents very big trouble with a potential for bank runs, seizure of pension plans to be converted for government usage (theft) and higher taxes. The newly proposed VAT tax could take an additional 25% more of your spendable income. Most will think this is outrageous. We suspect political criminals give it a testing try.

Now is the calm before the storm. This is the eye of the hurricane. This is not a Saturday evening warm gentle rain; this is a systemic fiscal tornado and many will be economically maimed, or destroyed. You cannot imagine how swiftly events could disrupt our system. Picture the arrival of ten simultaneous Katrinas, or even worse with no warning whatsoever. You get the idea.

We are normally, easy-going and not prone to these kinds of discussions. Our view is one of optimism. I am always seeking the brighter side with ideas to protect our homes, families and retirements. However, the quickening deterioration of current events has sincerely frightened me during the past few weeks.

This is not a simple changing of the political guard but perhaps Armageddon. If you think the government is in control and has a handle on these emergencies you are only kidding yourself. They are careening from one disaster to another. More new ones seem to come each day.

Bad news arrived with a rush and its becoming nastier with each passing day. We’ve seen so much scary stuff we are reluctant to report most of it lest we upset the trading teacart. Batten down the family hatches and count on nothing from anyone to help you. Plan for the worst and hope for the best.

Those who mostly drop out of our phony system and take care of themselves should be winners. We heard similar advice from a premier lady analyst on Jay Taylor’s VoiceAmerica radio show last week.

Markets are nearing a peak in precious metals shares that generally follow primary stock indexes. When the current stock market peaking descends into the Sell in May, PM shares normally follow. With each cycle we think gold and silver shares might sell less posting higher lows. This could be decided on the shorter term by how low S&P’s trade. We expect 800 to 850 with 800 being more probable.

Do not get tangled-up in daily noise. Keep studying the larger view and buy precious metals after each profit-taking correction. Headwinds are building into an economic hurricane. Take care of business right now. My dire fall prediction might surprise us and arrive earlier. Time is short.

Personally, I can see unbelievable opportunities to trade that we would never see again for many years. Turn these problems into opportunities. Those on the right side of the trade might get rich. Those on the other side are just victims. Stay Alert. –Traderrog

Sunday, June 7, 2009

Unemployment 9.4%

Goods producing industries cut 267,000 jobs while services cut 265,000.

Manufacturing firms cut 149,000 positions, the 39th consecutive decline. Construction firms shed 108,000 jobs, the 28th straight monthly decline. Financial firms cut 32,000 jobs, the 18th straight decline.

More than half a million jobs have been lost in each of the past seven months.


The ADP index does not include government jobs. To get an apples-to-apples comparison with the Labor Department report, you have to add in about 13,000 jobs typically gained in the public sector. That suggests total payrolls fell by about 520,000 in May, compared with the MarketWatch consensus of 500,000 for the Labor Department's estimate.

Economists currently expect the unemployment rate to rise to 9.2% in May from 8.9% in April.

The April ADP index was revised to a decline of 545,000 from a decline of 491,000 previously reported.

Employment in the private sector has fallen by 5.86 million since the recession began in December 2007, ADP said. Through April, private-sector employment as measured by the Labor Department survey had fallen by 6 million.

In May, employment in large companies declined by 100,000, employment in medium-sized companies fell by 223,000 and employment in small firms fell by 209,000.

Lenders Ask Supreme Court To Review Chrysler's Sale

Lenders Ask Supreme Court To Review Chrysler's Sale

By Tomoeh Murakami Tse
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, June 8, 2009

A small but persistent group of lenders has turned to the U.S. Supreme Court in its last attempt to challenge the government-backed sale of Chrysler's assets to a company run by Italian automaker Fiat.

Three Indiana state pension and construction funds late Saturday filed documents requesting that the sale be delayed so that the Supreme Court can hear their appeal. Two lower courts have already rejected the lenders' objections. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled the sale could go forward after 4 p.m. today or earlier if the Supreme Court declines to take up the case.

The Indiana funds' emergency application was made, under Supreme Court procedures, to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who oversees the 2nd circuit appeals court. Ginsburg could rule on her own or refer the matter to the high court.

The Indiana funds contend that the sale of most of Chrysler's assets to a new company -- to be jointly owned by Fiat, the United Auto Workers union and the U.S. and Canadian governments -- breaches numerous laws. For one, they argue, the process tramples on the funds' rights as senior lenders to Chrysler because they would recover less than junior lenders. The Indiana funds hold about $42 million of the $6.9 billion in secured loans. Under the agreement hammered out by the Obama administration with most of the first-lien lenders, the group would recover about $2 billion, or 29 cents on the dollar.

The funds also contend that the quick bankruptcy proceedings pursued by Chrysler and the Obama administration -- a federal bankruptcy judge approved the sale 32 days after the automaker filed for one of the largest bankruptcies in U.S. history -- did not comply with bankruptcy law. The Indiana funds are also arguing that the Treasury illegally used money from the federal Troubled Assets Relief Program, meant for financial institutions, to prop up Chrysler.

"Absent a stay, the Court will be deprived of the opportunity to decide critical, nationally significant legal issues relating to management of the economy by the United States Government," the Indiana funds wrote in their Supreme Court application. "The public is watching and needs to see that, particularly, when the system is under stress, the rule of law will be honored and an independent judiciary will properly scrutinize the actions of the massively powerful executive branch."

Joining the Indiana funds in requesting a stay is a coalition of consumer protection groups and tort claimants who are objecting to the sale of Chrysler's assets "free and clear" of product liability claims.

If the Supreme Court takes the rare step of granting the stay, it could threaten the Obama administration's rescue plan for the auto industry, which has cost taxpayers nearly $40 billion. General Motors is pursuing a type of bankruptcy similar to that of Chrysler, and both companies say a quick sale of their assets is critical. Indeed, Fiat can walk away from the Chrysler deal if a sale is not completed by June 15. The alternative, Chrysler's executives have testified in court, is liquidation and the loss of thousands of jobs.

Chrysler and others in favor of the sale last night were preparing to file responses to the high court but have said that first-lien lenders are getting 100 percent of the value of the sale and that no laws were violated.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Mozilo Charged

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - In two years, Angelo Mozilo, the son of a Bronx butcher and a rags-to-riches icon, went from the charismatic helmsman of America's top mortgage lender to the badly burned face of the nation's housing meltdown.

Known for a rich tan, flamboyant wardrobe and aggressive risk-taking, the man who built Countrywide Financial into the nation's top home lender now stands as a colorful poster boy of the dangers of unchecked real estate lending.

On Thursday, securities regulators filed charges accusing the 70-year-old Mozilo of insider trading and securities fraud.

The man dubbed "Tangelo" by business media is the biggest name yet to be accused of wrongdoing by U.S. investigators probing the subprime mortgage crisis and housing market collapse.

Born in 1938 to Italian immigrants and raised in The Bronx borough of New York City, Mozilo evangelized home ownership for everyone.

A golfing enthusiast whose home is said to abut the Sherwood Country Club in Ventura County, California, Mozilo built his company and his own prominence by riding the property boom. In 2006, at the height of its success, Countrywide originated $461 billion worth of loans -- close to $41 billion of which were subprime.

But his glory days were marked. Subprime mortgages ultimately poisoned the U.S. mortgage market.

As Countrywide buckled under the weight of mortgage defaults and home foreclosures, its own lenders curtailed credit, forcing it to draw down an $11.5 billion credit line.

Last July, Bank of America Corp bought Countrywide for $2.5 billion, less than 10 percent of what the company was worth in early 2007. Ten months later, Bank of America scrapped the Countrywide name.

FROM HERO TO ZERO

Even with the housing market disintegrating around Countrywide, Mozilo appeared confident about the company's ability to survive.

Last year, with the housing market in a shambles, he told executives at a mortgage bankers' conference, "You've got to be careful here about blaming ourselves too much."

The real culprits, he argued, were the Federal Reserve raising interest rates for too long, crooked real estate speculators, falling housing prices and regulators' attacks on interest-only and other risky subprime mortgages.

In 2007, Mozilo took in $121.5 million from exercising stock options and was awarded another $22.1 million of compensation, according to the industry-backed Leaders of the Center on Executive Compensation.

On Thursday, in a civil lawsuit filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in Los Angeles federal court, regulators accused Mozilo of making more than $139 million in profits in 2006 and 2007 from exercising 5.1 million stock options and selling the underlying shares.

The sales were under four prearranged stock trading plans Mozilo prepared during the time period, the SEC said in the lawsuit.

Mozilo's lawyer said the lawsuit "does not reflect a balanced or fair consideration of the facts or the law" and that the stock trades at issue were "entirely lawful."

Fix is in

Simon Johnson, former Chief Economist of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has recently warned that the US political system is being dominated by a financial oligarchy, which is distorting economic policy in favour of the banking sector. ("The Quiet Coup")

And Dick Durban, the senior-most Democrat in the US Senate said last month in an interview: "And the banks - hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created - are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."

Not many people realise that the Federal Reserve is not a part of the US government but that it is a private bank and is owned by other US banks. Americans expect the Fed to work on their behalf but the reality is that the Fed is the most effective tool the banking industry has to serve its interests.

And finally with Goldman Sachs' alumni running the US Treasury (Hank Paulson, Tim Geithner, Neel Kashkari, Robert Rubin, to name a few), the primary focus of the rescue package has been to not only save the banking sector but use the crisis to transfer hundreds of billions of dollars from taxpayers to the banks.

Thus economy policy is not focused on saving Main Street, but on self-servingly helping Wall Street.


Acamar Journal